Trial the development of Joe Keller Essay Example for Free

Trial the development of Joe Keller EssayThe audiences sympathy for Joe Keller oscillates through bug out the play. Ranging from duncical compassion to undisputed rage, the audience has plenty of time to view Joe Kellers development as the central flake of the novel. His emotional growth from beginning to end facilitates the empathy that the audience shows hence, Miller uses Keller as a character in order to build up the com choleric side of the audience in order to assemble a fabricated and well vox populi out character. Firstly, Keller tries to change Annes mind with respect to Stephen, and goes nigh it in a calm and relaxed manner. He mentions, I want him Stephen to subsist, Annie while hes sitting there I want him to know that when he gets out hes got a place waitin for him. His use of ellipsis is ambivalent, on one hand, it could signify the obscure emotion that Keller feels towards Stephen, but on the other hand, another c erstwhilealed meaning could be that Joe is t hinking about what he is saying, and so does not want to say anything wrong, and consequently has something to hide, giving him a more inauspicious figure.However, the repetition of he and him shows how sympathetic he feels towards the incarcerated man, hence giving the audience the impression that Joe Keller has emotions and can therefore be sympathised with. Subsequently, Miller alike casu onlyy slips in phrases that Keller says in casual conversation that show how passionate and considerate Keller is towards his family. When speaking to Anne about Stephen, he says, with a commanding outburst in high jitteriness that A father is a father This shows how important family is to Keller, however, the commanding outburst and nervousness also suggests that Keller has a hidden motive, and Chris presence may have influenced his body language, which suggests that Keller has done something wrong to be able to slip his son. This plays on the audiences sympathy positively, because the aud ience can empathise with Kellers love for his family and recognize his individual situation.Thirdly, Keller suggests that Stephen is a helpless coward in a conversation with his son, George, and offensively gives numerous examples in his defence. Keller mentions that Stephen damn near blew us all up with that heater he left burning for two days without water. Emotive words such as damn, blew and burning all have negative implications, giving the impression that Keller was the brains behind the business.The fact that Keller was also driving in, but intimidateed suggests that he wants to inflict his own ideas and beliefs onto George, but knows that he must restrain himself, giving the same implication that Keller has something to hide. However, this could also be considered as a defensive, rather than an offensive conversation, as George uses a rather accusational tone towards Keller and is studying him thoroughly. Finally, Chris holds great admiration for Keller, but is destroyed once he learns of his fathers terrible secret.When the realisation finally hits, Chris stutters in a broken whisper, Then you did it? The ellipsis shows the amount of thought that went into the phrase, suggesting that he doesnt want his father to be guilty but at the same time, wants to find out the truth. Keller begins to become afraid of him, with his deadly insistence suggesting that his son is his biggest asset but also his biggest downfall. This also shows, once again, that nothing is bigger than family to Keller.This conflict of ideologies, Chris with his morals and ethics, and Keller with his persistent cherishing of his family no matter what the cost, creates a disequilibrium within the play. At this point, the audience begins to sympathise with Chris rather than Keller, which diminishes Millers slow build up of Kellers respectability, providing more of a tragical stopping point to Keller. However, this tragic ending can also be interpreted as a chance to shape up sympat hise with Joe, as his world comes crashing down around him.Ultimately, Keller commits suicide at the end of the novel, resulting in the tragic downfall of Keller. He says, I think to him they were all my sons. This line shows the realisation of his wrongdoings. His morals and ethics atomic number 18 finally shown, as he stares blankly into the piece of paper in his hand. His suicide could represent Keller as taking his responsibilities rather than hiding from them, however, it could also suggest that Keller was a coward and he was merely running forth from the problems that he was to face if he did not accept his offences.Evidently, his defensive stance when talking to George, his conflict of beliefs with his son, and his supreme sacrifice all have a large part to play in Millers manipulation of the audiences sympathy. Keller was a coward and used scapegoats or escapism to run away from his problems, giving the ultimate impression to the audience that Keller as a human is not to be sympathised with. However, his growth as a character and his self-understanding both bid a suitable route to empathise with him, truly showing that the audience can choose whichever indication they prefer.